One consistent scale
Maturity is scored the same way across domains so comparison between candidate programmes is meaningful.
The EAX Product Suite™
EAX Navigator™
Enterprise transformation planning platform: assessment, prioritization, roadmap, and an executive report produced from the same inputs.
Private Preview
Executive overview
Transformation plans fail on sequence more often than on selection. The right programme in the wrong order produces cost without confidence.
Navigator collects an organizational position (industry, scale, constraints, current challenges, stated priorities) and produces a maturity view, a prioritized set of recommendations, and a phased roadmap that respects dependencies between domains.
Current availability
In private preview. A public version of the assessment instruments is available on the EAX Platform; the full planning workspace is released to selected organizations.
EAX NavigatorTransformation position
Domains assessed
9
single maturity scale
Priority actions
12
dependency ordered
Roadmap horizon
4Q
with confirming evidence
- Identity and accessLevel 2Prerequisite for automation track
- Cloud platformLevel 3Guardrails present, drift unmeasured
- Data foundationLevel 2Competing reporting definitions
- AI enablementLevel 1Blocked on permission boundaries
The business problem
What this removes
The conditions that make the work expensive, slow, or hard to defend.
Several credible programmes compete for the same quarter and the same people.
Maturity is asserted in slides rather than assessed against a consistent scale.
The plan the executive committee approves is not the plan delivery is holding.
Business value
What changes for the accountable executive
Dependency-aware sequencing
Recommendations are ordered against the prerequisites they need: identity before automation, definitions before reporting.
Evidence per milestone
Each roadmap milestone carries the indicator that will confirm it happened.
One artefact, one language
The executive report, the roadmap, and the assessment come from the same inputs, so they cannot drift apart.
Target organizations
- Enterprises running several modernization programmes in parallel
- Organizations preparing a multi-year technology plan for board approval
- Executive teams entering a transformation without an agreed baseline
Illustrative workflow
How the work would move through the platform
A representative sequence. Steps beyond the stated availability describe intended design rather than released behaviour.
State the position
Industry, scale, operating constraints, and regulatory context.
Record current challenges
The problems being lived with, in the words of the people living with them.
Set business priorities
What the organization intends to be true in twelve to thirty-six months.
Review the assessment
Maturity by domain, with the risks that follow from the gaps.
Issue the report
A prioritized roadmap and executive summary, exportable for the steering committee.
Future roadmap
Released, in build, and intended
Items outside the first column are direction rather than commitment. They may change or be withdrawn.
Available in preview
Released to selected organizations
- Guided assessment across nine domains
- Prioritized recommendations
- Four-quarter roadmap with evidence
Under development
Design agreed, build in progress
- Executive report export
- Scenario comparison between candidate sequences
- Retained assessment history
Planned
Direction, not commitment
- Portfolio view across business units
- Milestone tracking against the issued roadmap
Questions
Answered plainly
- How is this different from the tools on the Platform page?
- The public instruments give an indicative reading in a few minutes. Navigator is the planning workspace behind them: it retains the position, sequences recommendations across domains, and produces the executive report.
- Can I try it today?
- The public assessment instruments are open to anyone. The full workspace is in private preview and released to selected organizations.
- Does Navigator replace an advisory engagement?
- No. It structures the inputs and produces a defensible first plan. The judgement about what an organization should actually commit to is made with an advisor.
Request access
Discuss EAX Navigator™ with an advisor
Tell us the obligation or decision you are working against. If the product is not ready for your situation, we will say so and describe the advisory route instead.